History Of An Ethical Dilemma Social Work Essay Essay Example

History Of An Ethical Dilemma Social Work Essay Essay Example History Of An Ethical Dilemma Social Work Essay Essay History Of An Ethical Dilemma Social Work Essay Essay I would be lying to Raj and bewraying her trust and their relationship is this information was disclosed to a 3rd party ( Welfel, 2006 ) . However, while in instances of kid protection informed consent is non required due to holding a statutory responsibility to describe, I can be honorable and unfastened with Raj about what I plan on making to guarantee congruity and keep the curative relationship. There are many possible struggles between ethical rules and the jurisprudence. The jurisprudence states confidentiality must be abided so long as no 1 is at injury, nevertheless the BACP ethical rules of justness and self-respect guarantee that non merely does the professional consider the clients best involvement, without doing injury to themselves. However, by adhering to confidentiality about something I am morally against I would non be suitably using the ethical rules as entitlements for myself. While I have a chief duty to maintain Raj from injury, I besides must see the Aarons right for safety. While Raj has a human right to pick, I have an ethical and professional duty to guarantee I provide Raj with necessary information to guarantee the determination made is the best possible determination for Raj and Aaron and would do the least injury. By go toing clinical supervising and line direction supervising I will be able to have counsel on covering with quandary, derive a differing position on the state of affairs. Reflection will besides assist me understand the state of affairs more clearly. Fidelity I have established an effectual remedy relationship based on trust, congruity, safety, UPR and heat with Raj. It would be untrusty of me to transgress confidentiality as Raj trusts me. However as I am required by the BACP and administration to describe kid protection, I will necessitate to be honest with Raj and explain that I will necessitate to describe the incident nevertheless it would be better if she gave her consent and explicating why this affair needs to be reported. Autonomy Throughout the guidance procedure, I have valued Raj s liberty through pick and offering power to do determinations within therapy. I must esteem her determination by maintaining her stuff confidential and her right to be autonomous and do picks independently without hinderance ( Gillon, 1985 ) . However by assisting Raj see the state of affairs and effects exhaustively, through all positions, she will be able to do an informed determination. By deriving informed consent I will be staying by BACP guidelines every bit good as esteeming my client s right to pick and accurate information and being client-centred. By explicating my ethical duties in the catching procedure and repeating this and my demands in safeguarding kids when Raj made the revelation, I am informing her of foreseeable struggles every bit shortly as possible. Beneficence Raj is vulnerable, baffled, frightened and hard-pressed, therefore is it non certain if she is able to recognize her best involvement. She may non be moving rationally due to her fright of her ex-husband and concern over her boy. By explicating why it would be in her best involvements and Aarons best involvements to unwrap child maltreatment, I am demoing a committedness to advancing her wellbeing every bit good as being concrete and honest. Non-maleficence The action that would do the least sum of injury to Raj is to do the safeguarding qui vive without unwraping where I gained the information. While this will restrict the action societal services can take against her hubby and to protect her boy, it will guarantee that her hubby will non happen out that she or Aaron disclosed the maltreatment. If I was to non do the safeguarding qui vive, Raj would stay hard-pressed and fearing for her boy s safety which would do her farther emotional injury. Justice Raj has human rights to freedom and pick over her determination and the support she receives and the right to esteem for private and household life, nevertheless she and Aaron have a right to prohibition of anguish. The fairest determination for both Raj and Aaron is to do the safeguarding qui vive with informed consent. By honoring her right to information I am being fair by helping her to do an informed determination. I am besides being just to myself in staying by BACP moralss, the jurisprudence and organizational policies. Self-Respect I am being asked to travel against my ain beliefs and ethical motives every bit good statutory jurisprudence and BACP ethical guidelines, therefore conflicting with my right to beneficence, liberty, non-maleficence, justness and my human rights. BACP province informed consent should be sought before transgressing confidentiality, nevertheless the administrations policies province that clients do non necessitate to be informed when transgressing confidentiality for kid protection affairs, which would be dishonest of me and impact the curative relationship. This causes struggles within what is being asked of me, professionally, ethically, lawfully and morally what I feel is right. To work through these struggles I attended clinical supervising and discussed the quandary with my line director. Possible Courses of Action As a member of the BACP I am required to keep assurance at Raj s petition. By supplying a principle as to why confidentiality needs to be breached, I could work within the boundaries of my occupation and BACP ethical guidelines by assisting Raj to understand that this revelation would help in guaranting Aarons safety in the hereafter as processs would be put into topographic point to forestall farther injury to Aaron and a safety program can be formed to guarantee Raj is safe from injury from her ex-husband. I could explicate to her that when I make the revelation to societal services, I do nt hold to unwrap her personal inside informations and she can stay anon. therefore her ex-husband will non cognize that she has reported the incident. I can besides explicate to societal services that Aaron is at hazard of farther injury so processs will be put into topographic point to protect him should the incident be investigated. This will hopefully set Raj at easiness. Raj would necessitate to give written informed consent for me to portion her information with a 3rd party ( Welfel, 2006 ) , supplying she is to the full informed of all the facts to do that pick ( Gerch and Dhomhnaill ( 2005 ) . This would guarantee I am staying by the Data Protection Act ( 1998 ) . By giving a principle, offering a different position and accurate and necessary information, Raj will be able to do an informed determination. Raj is more likely to give me informed consent to do the revelation if I show her that she can swear me to see her best involvements and guarantee her safety every bit far as possible. I will let Raj clip to do up her head, and inquire inquiries to guarantee she does non experience pressured ( McLeod, 2010 ) . The other option is to transgress confidentiality without Raj s consent as a kid is at hazard of injury. This would intend the revelation could be made Oklahoman as I would non necessitate to talk to Raj therefore action to guarantee Aaron s safety could be taken Oklahoman. However, in making so I will damage the curative relationship, interrupting her trust and doing more psychological injury as she I would so be another individual in her life whom she trusted but allow her down, which will so do her more vulnerable and do trust issues within future relationships. Furthermore, Raj could take legal action against me or the administration ( Jenkins, 2007 ) . By taking this class of action I will be traveling against BACP ethical guidelines, the administrations ethos and my ain values and ethical motives as an integrative practician every bit good as safeguarding statute laws. To guarantee Raj s safety I still could maintain Raj s personal inside informations confidential when doing th e safeguarding qui vive. Course of Action Having referred to the Children s Act ( 1989, 2004 ) and it s back uping counsel for safeguarding kids ( HM Government, 2006, 2010 ) . I will explicate to Raj that due to ethical guidelines, the administrations policies sing kid protection and statutory and common jurisprudence every bit good as my moral responsibility of attention towards Aaron, I need to transgress confidentiality as stated in the guidance contract. I will explicate to her that this safeguarding qui vive will help in guaranting her boy s safety in the hereafter as there will be a record made and that societal services will make whatever they can to forestall farther injury to Aaron. I will explicate to Raj that when I raise this qui vive to societal services, if she prefers, I will non unwrap her personal inside informations, I will keep her namelessness in conformity to the information protection act ( 1998 ) ( Jenkins, 2007 ) and I will non unwrap where I got this information from therefore her hubby will non cog nize that she has reported the incident. However I will besides explicate to Raj that should she give me permission to unwrap where I got this information from it will be farther aid as the more grounds I can supply, the better opportunity there is of societal services moving upon the revelation. I will explicate that this is wholly her pick and I will esteem whatever determination she make, but I am professionally, ethically and lawfully required to transgress confidentiality, therefore enabling her to do an informed pick. Thus Raj would experience more confident and knowing about her determination and she will hold a pick in her determination ( BMAED, 2004, pp. 74 ) , therefore esteeming her liberty and Human Rights ( Bond, 2010 ) . I will besides explicate that due to my regard for Raj I would wish her permission to do this revelation and to hold upon what information will be shared every bit good as staying by BACP guidelines and the jurisprudence. By explicating to Raj why this action must be taken, how I will guarantee her and Aarons safety is maintained every bit much as possible and explicating each measure I will take and the information to be shared, I am demoing Raj that I value her and her sentiment, I have her best involvements at bosom and that protecting Aaron and keeping her safety is cardinal within the work that I am making. Ultimately I am representing she can swear me and supplying her with a safe environment, free from penalty. By besides offering alternate positions such as explicating the possible effects of non doing the safeguarding qui vive would besides let Raj to do an informed pick ( BACP, 2010 ) . It is of import that I am honest with Raj and that I give her the necessary information as this would represent fidelity, client liberty, regard, and equality. I will reassure Raj that I will back up her, listen to her and that as an Asiatic counselor I can understand her concerns sing household honor and confidentiality therefore I will keep her namelessness it she feels that it what she wants to make. By taking this class of action I show that I have considered catholicity, promotion and justness ( Bond, 2010, Gabriel and Casemore, 2010 ) and the ethical, legal and professional deductions, whereby I am staying by the BACP ethical model, the administrations policies on kid protection and statutory jurisprudence sing informations protection, confidentiality, and kid protection and safeguarding vulnerable grownups. Furthermore, I have considered the effects of this action within supervising, sing the consequence on the curative relationship, my ain rights and legal deductions if informed consent is non sought. Evaluation of the result The result was that after the 4th session, with informed consent I made a safeguarding qui vive whilst besides keeping Raj s namelessness, which led to societal services look intoing on Aaron and a record being made. Raj attended a farther where she reflected upon her curative advancement, her self-esteem and shared her determination to use for exclusive detention of Aaron. I would take this action once more for other clients and feel I made the right determination as I was honest, gave the necessary information, respected Raj s liberty, beneficence, maleficence and ensured that the determination was just for everyone involved, prevented farther injury to Raj, Aaron and abided by ethical and legal guidelines ( Bond, 2010, Gabriel and Casemore, 2010 ) . Furthermore, I considered the client s civilization and presenting issues which were relevant to guaranting her safety. Over all, I promoted the clients well-being and protected her from injury. Curative Relationship When clients are able to see us as truly concerned for them, that we are non seting on a professional facade, they will experience safe with us because we are dependable ( Merry, 2002 ) . By being honest about what I was meaning to make and explicating I was congruous yet mindful of the client s frame of mention and experience I highlighted I was sincere in offering aid. Beyond the physical cicatrixs, domestic force has profound effects on a adult females s dignity. Lewis ( 2003 ) stated an abused adult female needs to recover power and control over her life by doing independent picks and determinations. Carl Rogers ( 1951 ) highlighted that we all have the capacity to be to the full working if our power is given acknowledgment. Through a client centred attack based on regard, credence and pick, I helped Raj to recognize her worth and power within the curative relationship and therefore authorising her. Roger s nucleus conditions ( 1951 ) promote adult females to develop power from inside them in order to achieve improved self-awareness and to take control. Therefore by leting Raj to take control over what was go oning in therapy, I was assisting her become independent, and take control over the picks she wanted in life, whilst besides protecting her from injury and understanding her cultural demands through empathy and UPR. The addition in self-este em would enable farther self-awareness, which would subsequently assist accomplish successful therapy outcomes from alterations in personality and behavior ( Rogers, 1951 ) . These points highlight that I had provided a good quality of attention and maintained a good curative relationship ( BACP, 2010 ) . It must be considered, it is due to the effectual relationship that Raj felt comfy to do the revelation and through offering her power and liberty and being honest, she felt comfy with giving her consent as I was able to represent that her and Aaron s safety was paramount.